![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggV7oU4ftt4hyQXm9RD89vfGJRxxqYC23zQ9SQSZuom5GChG7JDG2NOV9lbdRz99oWRiehmqYse5t8ETf8ABY2g6_MyvM355ViBY64azbOJJ1rKgoQ-cbdSqjaXZW5e7T5bss8tice_60f/s200/Proring4.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib9rUL91rQbb7V67arNDOtr_8kH0Ev7_D-irAYwHIlFzBV5maVqLUF97HxRdmCxg5dW-VHwHr3OqJon5LP_KcbTyER54EK3Mk1z4tibZWVxuHTBq-bsuB252Q2yxyXjmTzV5p63rVh24ME/s200/Proring3.jpg)
Not that I think Pro will replace my other silver clays, but for some applications it's going to be great. Again, not a fan of the carbon, but for making tough rings or delicate parts, I can get around that...
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSx3ulu61rKLrWVBDtUIeF7lL3mWRkn5pLgGG9-w1N0sPoA92UOqkRdWG2ld5ZIiG0iUOjG_m2WtNK4gwoWq3eqqnlR8kKnGZKbxnUWR-tx6YHnegQnQ_F2AKKDlMfAUEQRV8FuRhO_jcG/s200/Proring1.jpg)
This ring is only 3 cards thick - and with the shrinkage rate being greater than PMC3, the resulting ring is even thinner than you'd expect. C'mon, who would make a PMC ring only 3 cards thick? Not me - till now. I tried to squeeze and crush it and... nothing.
Since that went so well, I made another one like it with some really skinny snakes around the edges (they worked beautifully) - also 3 cards thick and it won't crush either. I've asked students to try to squeeze the rings and they were impressed with the strength too. All the rings were fired in carbon for 1 hour. They were constucted @ 3.5-4 sizes larger. I didn't put any ring plugs in them. I figured if they got too small I'd just stretch them. I did end up stretching the wider band, but that worked just fine.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSx3ulu61rKLrWVBDtUIeF7lL3mWRkn5pLgGG9-w1N0sPoA92UOqkRdWG2ld5ZIiG0iUOjG_m2WtNK4gwoWq3eqqnlR8kKnGZKbxnUWR-tx6YHnegQnQ_F2AKKDlMfAUEQRV8FuRhO_jcG/s200/Proring1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgflBfr9IOnxKI23yV7p6riX7yxlloXbOESP2gZv_Tl8mtMealp_tZ-XzeDgnQWon1IK2wbH5-Ks-dNIvabCqemNwOvtCA_N8eby2l3-FJbOcm37yOPONX4UhdQhtJ86MNGS62et00WzEP/s200/Proring.jpg)
Since that went so well, I made another one like it with some really skinny snakes around the edges (they worked beautifully) - also 3 cards thick and it won't crush either. I've asked students to try to squeeze the rings and they were impressed with the strength too. All the rings were fired in carbon for 1 hour. They were constucted @ 3.5-4 sizes larger. I didn't put any ring plugs in them. I figured if they got too small I'd just stretch them. I did end up stretching the wider band, but that worked just fine.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm8X6KjWCXskYJ6xE2PNphc8Wc83yaTXjxs5FVnormJqDfaJJdB0rAq0c2hEl_1Y2goCyRKTpZa2OAW3rzoXF_mZKkrPhK6sSjO4PlTFK5lq1BzPIL38G29rNekz3MT-gE6iu3IVcKJGZy/s200/littlelentils.jpg)
The answer is (after a couple of tries) great! The best result so far is with my favorite wax (Mayco wax resist - on the heart shown here).
I did try my new kistka on this clay because it has worked well on PMC+, but with Pro I had some blistering issues. I shelf fired the all the water etched pieces prior to carbon firing to burn off the wax.
![]() |
after carbon firing |
![]() |
after shelf firing |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNxco4r1vw-XJklbDqwEubCC-DGq0d3-Q9YhZ0tqJpgBKDFpc1Jhw1eywuYdiER3xbfhL6EVMbi22NVclajuziXzifUGpMUVpGKEaz-yjc_mSnyupQQKzZ6WDAeMCE1MD2luqptdHjsNgz/s200/Proshrink.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilZ5OErVrlR52U7mncwrZQ0_bV7G48xQIkXd_1OCTz-kPa1eXPzdUTWDyTnYs9VMwjzfwqG_ma0ZTyysmbrtajDAcUIKLz8mIb2znI_FOGrFLDHdvM2FSa7UtzUdwc7UTrYnsj5qa3i3WO/s200/2card+bail.jpg)
So I'm impressed. I can see using it for ring bands and more delicate bails and findings. I have many more tests in mind, but so far, so good. I'd love to hear what others think if they've tried it.